May 31, 2017 / 8:23 AM / 6 months ago

Fitch Maintains ASE on Negative Watch; Assigns ST Ratings

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) SINGAPORE/HONG KONG, May 31 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has maintained the Rating Watch Negative (RWN) on Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc.'s (ASE) 'BBB' Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) and 'A+(twn)' National Long-Term Rating. Fitch has assigned ASE a Short-Term IDR of 'F3' and a National Short-Term Rating of 'F1(twn)'. ASE and Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. (SPIL) announced on 18 May 2017 that US anti-trust authorities have approved the plan by ASE and SPIL to establish a holding company to own 100% of the equity interests of both companies. The merger plan received approval from the Taiwan Fair Trade Commission in November 2016. However, it still needs approval from Chinese anti-trust authorities and shareholders. Fitch placed ASE's ratings on RWN on 17 December 2015 following ASE's proposed cash acquisition of SPIL's shares that it did not own. The companies' respective boards of directors approved the merger on 30 June 2016. The merger agreement, unless consummated, will expire by 31 December 2017. KEY RATING DRIVERS Negative Watch Maintained: If the proposed merger proceeds, ASE's ratings are likely to be based on the consolidated credit profile of the holding company, given the two entities will have strong operational and strategic linkages. The RWN reflects Fitch's belief that the holding company's consolidated credit metrics may be meaningfully worse than those of ASE. The RWN will be resolved when the completion of the proposed transaction is certain and the capital structure, financial profile and policies of the combined group are clear. We may affirm the ratings at their current levels or downgrade the ratings, though this is likely to be limited to a single notch. Weaker Leverage: We estimate that, if the merger proceeds and is funded entirely by debt, the holding company's consolidated pro-forma FFO-adjusted leverage could be around 3.0x in 2017, compared to our downgrade rating guideline of 2.0x for ASE on a standalone basis. We expect it will take two to three years for the group to deleverage to below 2.5x, depending on recovery in the global semiconductor industry, achievement of cost and capex synergies and dividend policy. The proposed deal will involve swapping each ASE share for 0.5 shares of the holding company and the holding company paying TWD51 in cash for each SPIL share. The offer for SPIL shares that ASE does not own, including the shares resulting from the likely conversion of SPIL's USD400 million outstanding convertible bonds, would cost TWD130 billion (USD4 billion) in cash, which may be funded by new debt. ASE raised about TWD10 billion in a rights issue during March 2017 to reduce its debt to around TWD98 billion (2016: TWD111 billion). Stronger Market Position: The combined entity will have a stronger business profile with about 29% in the outsourced semiconductor assembly and testing (OSAT) industry, stronger technological capabilities and ability to pool resources to cater for the fast-growing "system-in-package" business. We believe the combined entity will save on overlapping capex and R&D spend. However, these synergies may be offset by some revenue losses as some customers may diversify away from the combined group. On a pro forma basis, we estimate that consolidated group will have about USD7 billion-7.2 billion of lease-adjusted debt and EBITDA of USD2.7 billion-2.8 billion. Solid FCF Generation: We forecast the combined entity to generate at least USD400 million-500 million annually in FCF. The combined entity may invest about USD1 billion in capex and pay around USD400 million-500 million in dividends. The group may spend about USD300 million-400 million in interest and taxes. Low Single-Digit Revenue Growth: We believe ASE's revenue will grow by around 3%-4% in line with the overall growth in the smartphone industry. Smartphones continue to be the single most important driver of assembly and test services from OSAT companies. We expect the combined entity to have operating EBITDAR margin of around 19%-20%, which is similar to ASE's standalone profitability. Profitability could improve in the medium term if ASE manages to continue to improve its profitability in the electronic manufacturing services (EMS) segment. Gross margin in the EMS segment widened to 10% in 1Q17 (1Q16: 8%) due to better prices and cost savings. Negative Industry Outlook: The OSAT industry is likely to face soft market fundamentals, high competition, debt-funded consolidation, and large investment requirements. Competition is likely to remain intense because capacity utilisation could fall below 2016 levels as the industry's third-largest company, Jiangsu Changjiang Electronics Technology Limited (JCET), aggressively adds capacity and may gradually narrow the technology gap with Taiwanese peers. Average selling prices (ASPs) may decline by 3%-5% annually. Industry revenue may increase by only 3%-4%, driven by smartphone demand growth in China and India. Most analysts forecast global smartphone demand to rise by only a low-single-digit percentage in 2017 and for the PC and tablet market to continue to decline. The on-going consolidation in the OSAT industry will only partly address the fragmentation of the market and price erosion. The benefit of consolidation may be realised only in the medium term in the form of higher capacity utilisation, better bargaining power and stable ASPs. Short-Term Ratings: The short-term ratings assigned are based on the short-term/long-term rating relationships outlined in Fitch's Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates. The short-term ratings are not on RWN as we believe that any downgrade of the long-term ratings will be limited to a single notch; it would take a two-notch downgrade of the long-term ratings to lead to downgrades in the short-term ratings. DERIVATION SUMMARY ASE's 'BBB' ratings reflect its leading market position in the OSAT industry, technological capabilities and established relationship with its customers. ASE's 2017 FFO-adjusted leverage of 2.3x is better than OSAT peers, including Amkor's 2.5x and JCET group's 4.0x-4.3x. ASE's FCF generation is also much higher than peers' given its larger CFO relative to annual capex, which is due to its stable capacity utilisation. We believe that ASE's market position, advanced technological and packaging capability and diversity of revenue will help in withstanding intense competition in the industry. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch's key assumptions within our rating case for the issuer include: - Successful completion of the establishment and listing of the holding company in 2017 in line with the terms of the joint statement announced by both ASE and SPIL on 30 June 2016. - Revenue to grow by 3%-4% in line with the industry. - Stable EBITDA margin. - Progressive achievement in capex and R&D synergies over the medium term. - ASE to pay about TWD130 billion to acquire the rest (67%) of the stake in SPIL. RATING SENSITIVITIES Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action Positive rating action is currently not envisaged. If the merger does not proceed, Fitch would likely remove ASE's ratings from RWN and affirm its ratings. Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action Fitch plans to resolve the RWN once completion of the merger is practically certain and there is clarity on the merged entity's future capital structure and financial policies, which may take place six months after the merger's completion. The ratings will depend on pro-forma leverage on completion and on the visibility and credibility of a sustainable deleveraging path using post-dividend free cash flow and potential new equity proceeds. We may affirm the ratings at their current level with Stable Outlook, if, following discussions with the company, we determine that lower business risk offsets the higher financial risk associated with weaker credit metrics. LIQUIDITY Adequate Liquidity: At end-March 2017, ASE's had unrestricted cash of TWD38 billion and available undrawn committed facilities of TWD5 billion, which were sufficient to pay for the short-term debt of TWD35 billion. ASE has committed syndicated bank facilities available to fund the cash of TWD130 billion needed to acquire the remaining 67% stake in SPIL. FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc. - Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR of 'BBB' maintained on Rating Watch Negative - National Long-Term Rating of 'A+(twn)' maintained on Rating Watch Negative - Foreign-currency senior unsecured rating of 'BBB' maintained on Rating Watch Negative - Short-Term IDR assigned at 'F3' - National Short-Term Rating assigned at 'F1(twn)' Anstock II Limited - Rating on USD300m 2.125% senior unsecured guaranteed notes due 2017 of 'BBB'; maintained on Rating Watch Negative The notes are unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by ASE. Contact: Primary Analyst Nitin Soni Director +65 6796 7235 Fitch Ratings Singapore Pte Ltd One Raffles Quay, South Tower #22-11 Singapore 048583 Secondary Analyst Kelvin Ho Director +85 2 2263 9940 Committee Chairperson Steve Durose Managing Director +61 2 8256 0307 Media Relations: Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 67 96 7234, Email: leslie.tan@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates (pub. 10 Mar 2017) here National Scale Ratings Criteria (pub. 07 Mar 2017) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below