Reuters logo
Fitch Maintains Rating Watch Negative on Distilleries Company of Sri Lanka
September 27, 2017 / 8:18 AM / 2 months ago

Fitch Maintains Rating Watch Negative on Distilleries Company of Sri Lanka

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) COLOMBO, September 27 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has maintained the Rating Watch Negative (RWN) on Sri Lanka-based alcoholic beverage manufacturer Distilleries Company of Sri Lanka PLC's (DIST) National Long-Term Rating of 'AAA(lka)', as the company takes steps to complete its restructuring exercise and resolve its capital structure, which will require regulatory approval. Fitch placed DIST on RWN in September 2016 to reflect potentially higher financial risks following a group restructuring exercise. Fitch will resolve the RWN once DIST obtains the requisite regulatory approval to complete a private share placement to Melstacorp PLC, without which DIST will have a negative net asset position. The RWN resolution may take longer than the typical six-month period if regulatory approval is delayed. KEY RATING DRIVERS Restructuring Pending Regulatory Approval: Melstacorp, a then closely held subsidiary of DIST, issued new shares to DIST in August 2016 for which DIST paid by way of a LKR24.8 billion promissory note. DIST's shareholders then swapped their shares for Melstacorp shares on 30 September 2016, making DIST a 99.95% owned subsidiary of Melstacorp. At the same time, DIST wrote-off its erstwhile investment in Melstacorp, leaving a negative net asset position of LKR19 billion on DIST's balance sheet at 31 December 2016. DIST received an advance of LKR20 billion in January 2017 for which it expects to privately place new shares to Melstacorp. The private placement will be subject to Securities and Exchange Commission approval. Strong Linkages with Parent: We have assessed DIST on the basis of its parent's consolidated financial profile because we consider the linkages between DIST and Melstacorp to be strong, as defined in our Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage criteria. DIST accounted for 72% of Melstacorp's consolidated revenue and 85% of its EBITDAR in the financial year to March 2017 (FY17), excluding financial subsidiaries. The two companies also share the same board and DIST had previously provided financial support to weaker group entities in the form of corporate guarantees. EBITDA Margin to Improve: We expect DIST's standalone EBITDAR margin to recover to around 25%-30% over FY18-FY21, from around 19% in 1QFY18, as the company adopts better sourcing strategies. We also believe DIST should be able to pass on higher costs stemming from recent indirect-tax hikes; these included the introduction of a 15% VAT and 2% Nation Building Tax from November 2016, the doubling of import duty on ethanol - a key input - to LKR800 per litre in 2016 and sharp excise-tax hikes in 2015, which should not significantly increase for the next year. The group's EBITDAR margin contracted to 31.1% in FY17, from 33.3% in FY16, mainly due to the contraction in DIST's standalone EBITDAR margin to 36.5% in FY17 (FY16: 41.4%). Rating Headroom to Improve: We expect Melstacorp's consolidated group leverage, measured by net adjusted debt/EBITDAR, excluding financial subsidiaries, to peak at 1.6x in FY18 (FY17: 1.3x) and gradually improve along with a recovery in profit margins. Leverage is high at the group's telecom subsidiary, Lanka Bell Limited, and plantations subsidiary, Balangoda Plantations PLC. We expect Lanka Bell to continue incurring high capex, although moderating from LKR3.5 billion in FY17, as it continues to expand its 4G coverage. Volatile tea and rubber prices continue to affect the group's plantations sector. Leading Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturer: DIST accounts for over 60% of Sri Lanka's hard liquor production and has been able to maintain its market leadership due to its entrenched DCSL brand and access to a country-wide distribution network. The complete advertising ban on alcoholic beverage products acts as a high entry barrier and further strengthens DIST's market dominance. Importance to State Revenue: We expect the alcoholic beverage sectors' importance to government revenue to mitigate prohibitive regulation that could inhibit the industry's survival. As such, incremental excise tax increases on hard liquor should be slow, as prices beyond consumer affordability could lower the government's income. Excise taxes on liquor contributed an estimated 8% to government tax revenue in 2016, with DIST accounting for more than half of this amount. Acquisitive Nature - Event Risk: We believe the group's restructure will likely allow management to increase its focus on acquisitions in non-alcoholic beverage segments. The group has historically actively pursued acquisitions and, while it has not indicated it is pursuing specific acquisitions at present, DIST's rating could come under pressure if there are significant debt-funded acquisitions, particularly those that weaken the group's overall business risk and increase cash flow volatility. DERIVATION SUMMARY DIST is Sri Lanka's leading alcoholic beverage manufacturer, with a strong portfolio of well-known brands and access to an extensive distribution network. DIST has a smaller operating scale relative to other 'AAA(lka)' rated peers, Sri Lanka Telecom PLC (SLT, AAA(lka)/Stable) and Dialog Axiata PLC (AAA(lka)/Stable), because a significant portion of the country's alcoholic beverage consumption occurs outside the formal sector in which DIST operates. DIST is also exposed to more regulatory risk in the form of recurrent increases in indirect taxation, but these risks are counterbalanced by its substantially stronger free cash flow (FCF). The larger operating scale of SLT and Dialog reflects the size of the local telecom market and the companies' market leadership in fixed line and mobile, respectively. However, the companies require heavy capex to continue upgrading infrastructure and to service customers, driving negative FCF. DIST is rated four notches above Lion Brewery (Ceylon) PLC (A+(lka)/Negative), Sri Lanka's largest beer manufacturer. Lion has a significantly weaker financial profile compared with DIST, with leverage expected to remain above 3x for the next two years. Lion also has a smaller operating scale despite its market leadership in the beer industry, as the industry itself is still small in comparison with the hard liquor market, which DIST dominates. There has also been a shift back towards hard liquor consumption from beer, as higher taxes on beer production have removed the price advantage it previously enjoyed. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch's key assumptions within our rating case for the issuer include: - Group revenue growth to slow to low single-digits over FY18-FY21 as volume remains stagnant due to high prices (18% in FY17). - Group EBITDAR margin to contract to 22% in FY18 and recover by around 100bp annually from FY19, as DIST passes on costs. - Lower excise tax hikes, as the government would be mindful of falling revenue collection if demand were to decline. - Capex of LKR3 billion annually over FY18-FY21, mainly on account of Lanka Bell as it expands its 4G coverage. - A group dividend payout of 30% over the forecast period RATING SENSITIVITIES Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action Fitch will resolve the RWN once regulatory approval for the restructuring exercise is obtained. However, the resolution of the RWN could take longer than the typical six-month period if approval is delayed. Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action The rating could be downgraded if DIST is unable to obtain necessary regulatory approval. LIQUIDITY Comfortable Liquidity Position: The group had a comfortable liquidity position at end-March 2017, with LKR16 billion of unutilised but committed credit lines and LKR2 billion of unrestricted cash available to meet LKR3 billion of term debt maturing in the next 12 months. We expect the group to roll over LKR6 billion of short-term debt, mostly funding the group's working capital. The group has strong access to local banks due to its position as one of Sri Lanka's largest corporates and solid credit profile.] Contact: Primary Analyst Kanishka de Silva, CFA Analyst +94 11 254 1900 Fitch Ratings Lanka Ltd. Level 15-04 East Tower World Trade Center Colombo 01 Secondary Analyst Nadika Ranasinghe, CFA Vice President +94 11 254 1900 Committee Chairperson Hasira De Silva, CFA Director +65 6796 7240 Media Relations: Bindu Menon, Mumbai, Tel: +91 22 4000 1727, Email: bindu.menon@fitchratings.com. Note to editors: Fitch's National ratings provide a relative measure of creditworthiness for rated entities in countries with relatively low international sovereign ratings and where there is demand for such ratings. The best risk within a country is rated 'AAA' and other credits are rated only relative to this risk. National ratings are designed for use mainly by local investors in local markets and are signified by the addition of an identifier for the country concerned, such as 'AAA(lka)' for National ratings in Sri Lanka. Specific letter grades are not therefore internationally comparable. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Corporate Rating Criteria (pub. 07 Aug 2017) here National Scale Ratings Criteria (pub. 07 Mar 2017) here Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage (pub. 31 Aug 2016) here Additional Disclosures Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below