November 7, 2017 / 3:03 PM / 4 months ago

Fitch: Most Mexico Banks Ready for Basel III Liquidity Rules

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) MONTERREY/NEW YORK, November 07 (Fitch) It should not be difficult for Mexico's large and second-tier banks to meet new Basel III liquidity metric regulations says Fitch Ratings. However, the new rules may be a challenge for some small- and medium-sized banks and could require significant balance sheet adjustment. The introduction of a minimum liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and net stable funding ratio (NSFR) should be credit positive for the banking system as a whole, improving resilience during cyclical downturns by increasing liquidity and reliance on stable funding sources. All Mexican banks are already in compliance with their respective statutory minimum LCR set by regulators. Mexican commercial banks have been required to report their LCR since 2015, with an original minimum requirement increasing 10% each year until it reaches 100%. The largest and second largest groups of banks, which represented 89.8% of banking system assets by 3Q17 end, will have the full 100% LCR limit imposed by 2019. For 2017, the minimum requirement is 80% for the seven biggest banks (G7) in the country, and it will rise to 90% in 2018. Medium- and small-sized banks are required to have an LCR of 70% for 2018; the LCR is 60% for the newest banks. The introduction of the LCR has already led to change, with banks prioritizing more stable funding sources, primarily mid- to long-term deposits. We expect this trend to continue. Mid-sized institutions especially have been shifting toward more stable funding by increasing deposit terms or raising long-term funding in local capital markets. Further, the G7 have been changing their funding composition. As a result, system deposits have grown an average of 10.8% per year over the past five years, in some years exceeding lending growth. This trend could lower net interest margins (NIM) by raising funding costs. However, we believe the short- to medium-term impact on profitability is unlikely to be significant for large banks or the banking system. We expect margins to remain at adequate levels over the medium term. The system's quarterly average LCR since 2015 was 181.5%, but this is skewed by the G7, which account for 80% of total system assets and benefit from stronger deposit franchises and better access to long-term capital market funding. Since the LCR was implemented, only one of 48 banks has been sanctioned by regulators for failing to meet the minimum required. All banks are currently in compliance with LCR regulations. Smaller banks that are highly dependent on wholesale funding and have less financial flexibility to adapt balance sheets are likely to face challenges in meeting new liquidity requirements. This is especially the case with the introduction of the NSFR, which should go into effect in 2018 if local regulators follow the Basel III implementation calendar. Local authorities stated that an NSFR requirement would go into effect in January of next year but have yet to announce any specific rules. Without the specifics of the NSFR regulations, it is difficult to determine the potential adjustment that may be required by some banks. However, we believe it likely that some mid- and small-sized banks will have to make significant balance sheet adjustments to meet the requirements, including managing assets to reduce required stable funding. In contrast, G7 banks should not face difficulties in complying with NSFR requirements. As with the LCR, they will benefit from their strong deposit franchises and greater ability to adapt their balance sheet. Tier II banks should also not face significant challenges with their balance sheets evolving to more closely resemble their G7 counterparts. Contact: German Valle, CFA Associate Director, Financial Institutions +52 81 8399 1116 Fitch Mexico S.A. de C.V. Prol. Alfonso Reyes No. 2612 Edificio Connexity, Piso 8 Col. Del Paseo Residencial Monterrey 64920 Alejandro Tapia Director, Financial Institutions +52 81 8399 9156 Justin Patrie, CFA Senior Analyst, Fitch Wire +1 646 582 4964 33 Whitehall St. New York, New York 10004 Media Relations: Benjamin Rippey, New York, Tel: +1 646 582 4588, Email: Additional information is available on The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below