Reuters logo
Fitch Places Halyk Bank on Rating Watch Negative
March 9, 2017 / 4:15 PM / 8 months ago

Fitch Places Halyk Bank on Rating Watch Negative

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) LONDON/MOSCOW, March 09 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has placed Halyk Bank of Kazakhstan's (HB) 'BB' Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) and its 'bb' Viability Rating (VR) on Rating Watch Negative (RWN). Fitch has also placed the 'CCC' Long-Term IDRs of Kazkommertsbank (KKB) on Rating Watch Evolving (RWE) and downgraded the bank's VR to 'f' from 'ccc'. The rating actions follow recent announcements by the banks and the Kazakh authorities on HB's potential acquisition of a controlling stake in KKB. A full list of rating actions is provided at the end of this commentary. For more details on the banks' pre-acquisition financial profiles, please see 'Fitch Downgrades Tsesnabank to 'B', Affirms 5 Other Kazakh Banks' dated 20 December 2016 at KEY RATING DRIVERS - HB'S IDRS, VRS The RWN on HB's ratings reflects the possible negative impact on HB's capitalisation and asset quality as a result of the potential acquisition of KKB. Fitch expects that HB will only acquire KKB if the latter first receives direct or indirect considerable financial support. The National Bank of Kazakhstan (NBK) has announced that such support is likely to take the form of a purchase of KKB's problem assets by the problem loan fund (PLF). KKB has said that such support should result in "the coverage of possible risks connected with the loan owed to KKB by JSC BTA Bank", the main risk on KKB's balance sheet, which was equal to 6x its Fitch Core Capital (FCC) at end-1H16. Notwithstanding this expected support, Fitch believes there is a material risk that KKB's problem assets may not be fully removed from the bank's balance sheet or adequately reserved prior to a transaction. Senior country officials recently committed to providing KZT2 trillion to the PLF for subsequent problem asset purchases, of which KZT1.1 trillion has been provided. This compares with a net exposure to BTA of KZT2.4 trillion. HB's capitalisation could weaken significantly as a result of the acquisition of KKB. If HB's consolidated FCC remains unchanged following the transaction (i.e. it pays for KKB an amount equal to KKB's post-clean-up net asset value) and its consolidated risk-weighted assets (RWAs) increase by those of KKB (net of the RWAs associated with the BTA exposure), then HB's FCC ratio would fall from 19.5% (at end-3Q16) to 11.3%. Potential additional provisioning needs on KKB's assets could represent a further drag on HB's solvency, although this would still be supported by HB's strong internal capital generation, in Fitch's view. HB's pre-impairment profit (annualised) was equal to a high 7% of average loans in 9M16. KKB's pre-impairment profit (adjusted for interest income accrued but not received in cash and other non-recurring items) was negative in 9M16, but should become positive if it replaces the BTA exposure with income-earning assets. Fitch does not expect any significant negative impact on HB's strong funding and liquidity profile as a result of the transaction. Any cash payment for KKB is likely to be small relative to HB's liquidity buffer and Fitch does not expect material volumes of KKB's debt to be accelerated as a result of any acquisition. The consolidated loans/deposits ratio (assuming the removal of the BTA exposure) would be about 64%, compared with 79% at HB at end-3Q16. KEY RATING DRIVERS - KKB'S IDRS, VRS The RWE on KKB's 'CCC' Long-Term IDRs reflects the potential for the ratings to be upgraded as a result of an acquisition by a higher-rated institution and the expected clean-up of the loan book and the potential for the ratings to be downgraded to 'RD' (Restricted Default) if any losses are imposed on senior creditors as part of the restoration of the bank's solvency (the authorities have given no indication that losses will be imposed). The ratings could also be downgraded in case of a hypothetical breakup of the deal and, hence, the collapse of the main financial rehabilitation scenario for KKB proposed by the authorities. The downgrade of KKB's VR to 'f' from 'ccc' reflects Fitch's view that the bank has failed and requires external support to address a material capital shortfall. In Fitch's view, the planned large asset sale to the PLF represents a de-facto recognition by the Kazakh authorities of the scale of KKB's asset-quality and solvency problems. Fitch has not downgraded KKB's IDRs following the downgrade of the VR as the bank continue to services its obligations and may receive external support without losses being imposed on senior creditors. KEY RATING DRIVERS - SUPPORT RATINGS (SR) AND SUPPORT RATING FLOORS (SRF) The affirmation of HB's SR at '4' and SRF at 'B' reflects the bank's exceptional systemic importance, but also the authorities' record of imposing losses on senior creditors in bank resolutions. The RWP on KKB's SR of '5' reflects the potential for this to be upgraded if KKB is acquired by a higher-rated bank. The RWP on the SRF of 'No Floor' considers positively the plans to provide material financial support to the bank. KEY RATING DRIVERS - DEBT RATINGS The Rating Watches on the banks' debt ratings match those on their Long-Term IDRs. Fitch has placed KKB's dated subordinated and perpetual debt ratings on RWE (rather than downgraded them in line with the VR) to reflect uncertainty as to whether they will absorb losses as part of the bank's resolution. KEY RATING DRIVERS - HB'S SUBSIDIARIES The RWN on the support-driven Long-Term IDRs and SRs of HB's subsidiaries - JSC Halyk Finance (HF) and JSC Halyk Bank Georgia (HBG) - match the RWN on the parent. RATING SENSITIVITIES Fitch expects to take rating actions on HB, KKB, HF and HBG when the acquisition is completed (or abandoned) and sufficient information is available on the financial profiles of the entities following the transaction. The resolution of the rating watches may take more than six months, although Fitch understands that if the parties go ahead with the planned transaction, then they aim to complete it reasonably promptly. HB and its subsidiaries could be downgraded if in Fitch's view the bank's asset quality and/or capitalisation weaken materially as a result of the acquisition. However, the ratings could be affirmed if in Fitch's view any weakening of asset quality or capitalisation is moderate, or if the transaction is abandoned. KKB could be upgraded to a rating level close to that of HB if it is acquired by the latter and in Fitch's view HB would have a strong propensity to support its subsidiary. KKB could be downgraded if senior creditors absorb losses as part of the bank's resolution, or if the transaction is abandoned without an alternative creditor-friendly resolution scenario being proposed. The rating actions are as follows: Halyk Bank of Kazakhstan Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs: 'BB'; placed on RWN Short-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs: affirmed at 'B' Viability Rating: 'bb'; placed on RWN Support Rating: affirmed at '4' Support Rating Floor: affirmed at 'B' Senior unsecured debt: 'BB'; placed on RWN Kazkommertsbank Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs: 'CCC'; placed on RWE Short-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs: 'C'; placed on RWE Viability Rating: downgraded to 'f' from 'ccc' Support Rating: '5'; placed on RWP Support Rating Floor: 'No Floor'; placed on RWP Senior unsecured debt long-term rating: 'CCC'; placed on RWE; Recovery Rating at 'RR4' Senior unsecured debt short-term rating: 'C'; placed on RWE Dated subordinated debt: 'CC'; placed on RWE; Recovery Rating at 'RR5' Perpetual debt: 'C'; placed on RWE; Recovery Rating at 'RR6' JSC Halyk Bank Georgia Long-Term IDR: 'BB-'; placed on RWN Short-Term IDR: affirmed at 'B' Support Rating: '3'; placed on RWN JSC Halyk Finance Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs: 'BB'; placed on RWN Short-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs: affirmed at 'B' Support Rating: '3'; placed on RWN Contact: Primary Analysts Roman Kornev (HB, HF, KKB) Director +7 495 956 7016 Fitch Ratings CIS Ltd 26 Valovaya Street Moscow 115054 Alyona Plakhova (HBG) Associate Director +7 495 956 2409 Fitch Ratings CIS Ltd 26 Valovaya Street Moscow Secondary Analysts Sergey Popov (HB, HF) Associate Director +7 495 956 9981 Maria Kuraeva (KKB) Associate Director +7 495 956 9901 Konstantin Alekseenko (HBG) Analyst +7 495 956 2401 Committee Chairperson James Watson Managing Director +7 495 956 6657 Media Relations: Elaine Bailey, London, Tel: +44 203 530 1153, Email:; Julia Belskaya von Tell, Moscow, Tel: +7 495 956 9908, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here Global Non-Bank Financial Institutions Rating Criteria (pub. 15 Jul 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1020307 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below