Reuters logo
Fitch: Post-Acute Healthcare Shaken by Regulatory Announcements Despite ACA Inaction
August 30, 2017 / 1:29 PM / 25 days ago

Fitch: Post-Acute Healthcare Shaken by Regulatory Announcements Despite ACA Inaction

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) NEW YORK, August 30 (Fitch) Washington, D.C. remains the driver of outlooks across the healthcare provider spectrum albeit through regulatory changes rather than larger efforts to repeal and/or replace the Affordable Care Act, according to Fitch Ratings. Recent announcements by The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) would reduce the regulatory and financial burdens (including reporting complexities) that bundled payments (bundles) presented to providers. These announcements will allow for more flexibility in choice of care settings albeit at the expense of some of the catalysts driving coordination and risk-sharing amongst providers. Credit implications from the announcements have ranged from volume winners to mixed to volume and share of expenditure givers. Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) should see volume growth and skilled nursing operators (SNFs) should see a volume headwind temper. Meanwhile general acute hospitals will see some volume loss to ASCs offset by a reprieve from the compliance and risk-sharing elements of bundles. Home-health operators will be negatively affected by the bundle changes, which remove a previous catalyst for volume gains, and a separate announcement that may reset rates. Over the long term, Fitch continues to expect that financial constraints and demographic-driven demand will be powerful motivators to shift care to the lower cost settings of providers with the financial resources to risk-share and coordinate with operators in other settings. CMS proposed removing total knee replacements from the inpatient-only list for 2018 and also requested comments on whether total hip and partial hip replacements should also be removed from the list. This would be another win for ASCs, as adding knee and hip replacements gives them access to roughly $7 billion in annual Medicare spend. The proposal may also help to alleviate some of the recent volume pressures ASC operators have been experiencing as commercial-insured patients delay surgeries due to high deductible plans but will accelerate the existing admissions issues at general acute care hospitals. General acute care and SNFs received a reprieve from one of their operating headwinds when CMS took more definitive steps to pause bundled payment initiatives. Bundles were structured to lower aggregate payments by incentivizing coordination and risk-sharing amongst providers by paying for episodes of care rather than individual components and had led to some care occurring at lower cost settings such as home health. CMS' announcement will narrow the number of mandatory markets for the joint replacement bundle, allow for voluntary participation in the remaining markets and low volume/rural hospitals in all areas and will cancel the cardiac bundles that were scheduled to begin. These actions when coupled with Secretary Price's intimations indicate alternative payment models will not be as meaningful a portion of Medicare payments as the previous Administration aspired that they would be. Smaller bundles in terms of both scale and scope are a short-term credit positive, on the margin, for general acute care, SNFs and their REIT landlords. However, this does not change Fitch's view that SNF revenues and operating margins will still be pressured by remaining headwinds such as the growth in Medicare Advantage (i.e. shorter stays and lower rates), Department of Justice investigations into billing practices and wage inflation. Fitch will monitor the extent to which providers continue to use partnerships, joint ventures and other means of coordination given the existing investments even in the absence of government catalysts. Contact: Britton Costa, CFA Senior Director +1-212-908-0524 Fitch Ratings 33 Whitehall St New York, NY 10004 Caitlin Blalock Associate Director +1-512-215-3732 Megan Neuburger, CFA Managing Director +1-212-908-0501 Media Relations: Alyssa Castelli, New York, Tel: +1 (212) 908 0540, Email: alyssa.castelli@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below