Reuters logo
Fitch Rates Advanced Wireless Network's Bonds 'AA+(tha)'
November 7, 2017 / 3:12 AM / 14 days ago

Fitch Rates Advanced Wireless Network's Bonds 'AA+(tha)'

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) BANGKOK, November 06 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings (Thailand) Limited has assigned Advanced Wireless Network Company Limited's (AWN, AA+(tha)/Stable) THB9 billion senior unsecured debentures due in 2027 a National Long-Term Rating of 'AA+(tha)'. Proceeds will be used to refinance maturing debt, fund capex and for investment. The debentures are rated at the same level as AWN's National Long-Term Rating, as they constitute its direct, unsecured, unconditional and unsubordinated obligations. KEY RATING DRIVERS Ratings Equalised with Parent: AWN's ratings are equalised with those of its parent, Advanced Info Service Public Company Limited (AIS, BBB+/AA+(tha)/Stable), to reflect the strong links between the two companies, in line with Fitch's Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage criteria. AIS fully owns AWN and controls its management and operations. AWN was awarded 2.1GHz and 1.8GHz licences and won the auction for the 900MHz spectrum in May 2016. AWN is of strategic importance to its parent as the operator of AIS's licensed business. High Investment Requirements: Fitch expects the rating headroom of AIS to remain low in 2017 and 2018 due to high capex and spectrum payments. We forecast negative free cash flow (FCF) for AIS, as cash flow from operations is unlikely to cover capex and dividend payouts. We estimate AIS's FFO adjusted net leverage will stay around 2.0x in 2017 and 2018 (end-1H17: 1.8x). More Rationalised Competition: Fitch expects price competition in the Thai telecom sector to stabilise in 2H17 and 2018, as operators shift their focus to profitability rather than market share and scale down handset subsidies. AIS and Total Access Communication Public Company Limited (DTAC; BBB/AA(tha)/Stable) have been cutting handset subsidies and only offering subsidies on post-paid plans since 1Q17. We expect True Corporation Public Company Limited's mobile unit to decrease handset subsidies for the pre-paid segment in 2H17, after passing DTAC in service-revenue market share in 1Q17. Earnings to Recover: Fitch expects AIS's operating EBITDAR to improve strongly to around THB72 billion in 2017, from THB63 billion in 2016, led by lower handset subsidy expenses. Marketing expenses as a percentage of AIS's service revenue, including handset subsidies, dropped significantly to 8% in 1H17, from 14% in 2016. AIS's earnings should also benefit from the May 2017 cut in the universal service obligation fee to 2.50% of licence holders' service revenue, from 3.75%. The company's EBITDAR margin improved to 46% in 1H17, from 41% in 2016. Data Supports Revenue Growth: Fitch expects AIS's service revenue, excluding interconnection charges, to rise by around 5%-6% in 2017, supported by continued growth in mobile-data usage and an expanding fixed-broadband subscriber base. Mobile-service revenue is likely to rise at a more moderate 3%-4%, with strong expansion in non-voice services being partly offset by lower voice revenue. We forecast fixed-broadband revenue to increase significantly to around THB2.5 billion in 2017, from THB860 million in 2016. Leading Market Position: AIS has maintained its leading market position as Thailand's largest mobile-phone operator by service revenue for the past several years. Fitch expects AIS to maintain its service-revenue market share of around 50% in the medium term (2016: 49%). AIS benefits from economies of scale due to its large subscriber base as well as its strong brand and extensive network coverage. DERIVATION SUMMARY AWN's ratings are equalised with those of AIS due to the strong linkages between the two companies. AIS's credit profile is supported by its strong market position as Thailand's largest mobile-phone operator and its conservative financial profile. AIS's ratings are higher than those of its domestic peer, DTAC, due to DTAC's smaller size, weaker market position and lower profit margin. DTAC's ratings incorporate a one-notch uplift from the linkages with its parent, Telenor ASA of Norway, which has strong board and management control of its subsidiary. AIS's credit profile is comparable with that of the Philippines' largest telecom operator, PLDT Inc. (BBB/AAA(phl)/Stable). Both are the largest telecom operators in their respective markets. PLDT's higher financial leverage is offset by its stronger business profile from diversified telecom services, which include both fixed-line and mobile services. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer include: - Mid-single-digit service revenue growth in 2017 and 2018 (2016: 1.6%) - Operating EBITDAR margin to improve to 45%-46% in 2017 and 2018 (2016: 41%) due to lower handset subsidies and a reduction in the universal service obligation fee - THB40 billion-45 billion a year for network capex in 2017 and 2018 (2016: THB40 billion) RATING SENSITIVITIES Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action -Positive rating action on AIS, provided linkages between AIS and AWN do not weaken Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action -Negative rating action on AIS For the ratings of AIS, Fitch outlined the following sensitivities in its Rating Action Commentary of 16 October 2017. Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action -Positive FCF and an operating EBITDAR margin above 45%, both on a sustained basis Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action -FFO adjusted net leverage rises above 2.0x on a sustained basis or -Unfavourable regulatory changes LIQUIDITY Manageable Liquidity: AWN's liquidity should be manageable, even though the company had high short-term debt at end-1H17. Of total THB22.4 billion in short-term debt at end-1H17, THB15.4 billion is a short-term loan from its parent. We expect part of this loan to be rolled over once it has matured. Fitch believes AWN's cash balance of THB2.9 billion, available committed bank loan of USD19.0 million and undrawn short-term bank facilities of THB19.7 billion at end-1H17 should provide enough liquidity to support THB7.0 billion short-term loans from banks. In addition, AWN's ability to access the local debt market should provide liquidity to support the likely negative FCF in 2017 and 2018. Contact: Primary Analyst Obboon Thirachit Director +66 2 108 0159 Fitch Ratings (Thailand) Limited Level 17, Park Ventures, 57 Wireless Road, Lumpini, Patumwan Bangkok 10330 Secondary Analyst Nichaya Seamanontaprinya Associate Director +66 2 108 0161 Committee Chairperson Sajal Kishore Senior Director +61 2 8256 0321 Date of Relevant Rating Committee: 12 October 2017 Summary of Financial Statement Adjustments - Other income is excluded from EBITDA calculation . Note to editors: Fitch's National ratings provide a relative measure of creditworthiness for rated entities in countries with relatively low international sovereign ratings and where there is demand for such ratings. The best risk within a country is rated 'AAA' and other credits are rated only relative to this risk. National ratings are designed for use mainly by local investors in local markets and are signified by the addition of an identifier for the country concerned, such as 'AAA(tha)' for National ratings in Thailand. Specific letter grades are not therefore internationally comparable. For regulatory purposes in various jurisdictions, the supervisory analyst named above is deemed to be the primary analyst for this issuer; the principal analyst is deemed to be the secondary. Media Relations: Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 67 96 7234, Email: leslie.tan@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Corporate Rating Criteria (pub. 07 Aug 2017) here National Scale Ratings Criteria (pub. 07 Mar 2017) here Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage (pub. 31 Aug 2016) here Additional Disclosures Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below