Reuters logo
Fitch Rates IBK's Basel III AT1 Notes 'BB+(EXP)'
July 12, 2017 / 10:16 AM / 4 months ago

Fitch Rates IBK's Basel III AT1 Notes 'BB+(EXP)'

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) SEOUL, July 12 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has assigned the proposed US dollar-denominated perpetual subordinated notes of South Korea's Industrial Bank of Korea (IBK; AA-/Stable) an expected rating of 'BB+ (EXP)'. While the size of the issue has yet to be determined, the notes have a call option after five years and each interest payment date thereafter. The notes will be issued under IBK's USD8 billion global medium-term note programme, which was last updated on 30 June 2017. IBK will use the proceeds for its general corporate purposes. We expect the notes to qualify as Basel III Additional Tier-1 (AT1) securities for regulatory capital purposes. The final rating is contingent upon the receipt of final documents conforming to the information already received. KEY RATING DRIVERS Fitch rates the Basel III AT1 notes four notches below IBK's Viability Rating (VR) of 'a-' by applying two notches for loss severity relative to the recovery prospects of senior unsecured debt and another two notches for the high incremental non-performance risk relative to the anchor rating. The anchor rating of the notes is the VR, which is consistent with Fitch's criteria and captures the notes' going-concern loss-absorption feature - the coupon omission risk. The two notches for the incremental non-performance risk are lower than the typical three notches Fitch would apply to a Korean commercial bank's AT1 notes with similar terms and conditions to IBK's. Management is given full discretion on coupon payments or omissions. However, Fitch views that in practice this decision would be in effect dictated by South Korea's government (AA-/Stable), the policy bank's controlling shareholder and ultimate support provider. We expect the government to be reluctant to allow a coupon omission due to wider implications for the banking system, for example on funding costs. The repercussions of omitting a coupon would potentially not be limited to IBK as the Korean financial system benefits from the stability provided by its policy banks, which in aggregate account for about a quarter of the system's total assets and loans. The two notches for loss severity reflect the notes' poor recovery prospects because the AT1 notes will be fully and permanently written-off if and when IBK is designated by the local regulator as an insolvent financial institution according to Article 2 of the Act on the Structural Improvement of the Financial Industry, the key resolution legislation in Korea. This means that investors would not recover any of their investment. The coupon payments may be partially or fully restricted if IBK's regulatory capital ratios fall into the capital buffer zone (for more details on the capital buffer zone, see <a href="">Fitch: AT1 Coupon Risk in Focus on New Korean Bank Capital Rules, dated 17 March 2016). At end-1Q17, IBK would have surpluses of 2.6 percentage points (pp), 2.5 pp and 2.8 pp to the fully phased-in additional buffer requirements of Common Equity Tier-1, Tier-1 and total capital-adequacy ratios in 2019, respectively, assuming the current 0% countercyclical capital buffer holds. Moreover, a forceful coupon cancellation may be triggered if the local regulator imposes against IBK prompt-corrective measures, pursuant to Article 97 of the Regulation on Supervision of Banking Business. It can also be triggered if the regulator imposes on IBK an emergency measure (eg restrictions on acceptance of deposits and a prohibition on repayment of debts) pursuant to Article 38 of the same regulation. The government has been a responsible shareholder of its policy banks as it has helped them meet all their regulatory capital requirements, mostly by injecting capital into the banks in a proactive manner, and effectively preventing the policy banks' capital ratios from falling into the capital buffer zone. Fitch believes that there is an extremely high probability of the government providing continued ongoing support, if needed, to IBK, and currently does not have concerns over IBK's ability to avoid falling into the capital buffer zone. RATING SENSITIVITIES The rating of IBK's Basel III AT1 notes is sensitive to a change in IBK's Viability Rating, which in turn is sensitive to IBK's operating environment and risk appetite. (For details, see <a href="">Fitch Affirms 3 Korean Policy Banks' IDRs; IBK's VR Rated 'a-', dated 4 July 2017). The rating of the notes is also sensitive to a change in Fitch's assumptions about the notching for incremental non-performance risk. For example, it could be widened if Fitch develops concerns over IBK's ability and flexibility to service full coupon payments on time, which potentially depends on the government's propensity to provide support to IBK. Contact: Primary Analyst Matt Choi Associate Director +82 2 3278 8372 Fitch Australia Pty Ltd, Korea Branch 9F Kyobo Securities Building 97, Uisadang-daero, Yeongdeungpo-Gu Seoul 07327, South Korea Secondary Analyst Heakyu Chang Senior Director +82 2 3278 8363 Committee Chairperson Parson Singha, CFA Senior Director +662 108 0151 Media Relations: Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below