Reuters logo
Fitch: Recovery in Belarus Bank Lending is Still Some Way Off
May 23, 2017 / 10:32 AM / 7 months ago

Fitch: Recovery in Belarus Bank Lending is Still Some Way Off

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) Link to Fitch Ratings' Report: Belarus Banking Sector: Recovery Pending here LONDON, May 23 (Fitch) A return to growth in Belarusian bank lending is still some way off, Fitch Ratings said at its annual conference on Belarus in Minsk today. We expect new lending (excluding exchange-rate effects) to be at best flat in 2017. Volumes will be constrained by the still-contracting economy and banks' deteriorating asset quality, although the decline that began in 2015 could end this year. The banking sector's new lending fell 4.6% in 2015 and 7.9% in 2016. Government-directed and subsidised lending to prioritised economic sectors is being scaled back as it represents a significant contingent liability for the public-sector balance sheet. It fuelled overall lending growth in the past decade and accounted for more than 40% of the banking sector's stock of loans at end-2016, with about 18% (equal to about 7% of GDP) secured by central and local government guarantees. Corporate lending will remain limited by borrowers' generally high leverage, while the government will focus on the clean-up of state-owned banks' balance sheets to support their capital and performance. We expect this process to be gradual given the government's limited financial capacity for significant support. In contrast, we expect retail lending to keep growing this year, at low single digits, driven by housing lending transacted via state-owned Belarusbank under government programmes. Retail accounts for about 20% of the sector's total loan stock. Pressure on earnings is likely to persist in 2017, due to lack of lending growth and weakened asset quality following the two-year recession and the sharp fall in the currency. Lending in Belarus is highly dollarised (56% of the total). Regulatory non-performing loans (NPLs) doubled to 13.7% of gross credit exposure at end-1Q17 from 6.8% at end-2015. The government is addressing this with its initiative to transfer problem assets to a non-bank vehicle and replacement of state-guaranteed problem loans with long-term bonds issued by local governments. State-owned banks accounted for about 70% of sector NPLs, reflecting their high share of overall lending. The banking sector reported positive operating results in 2016 but this is helped by delayed provisioning for impaired loans. We estimate that pre-impairment profits could be sufficient to increase reserve coverage of NPLs to a more solid 80% from a weak 45% at end-2016, over a 12-month period. But further provisioning could become necessary given the difficult operating environment. Increased regulatory solvency requirements introduced in 2016 are positive for financial stability. But we view banks' capital buffers as modest relative to high credit risk and unreserved NPLs, equal to 32% of regulatory capital at end-1Q17, a figure we believe may be understated due to loan restructuring. We rate six banks in Belarus, all at 'B-'/Stable. These ratings are underpinned by potential support either from the Belarus state or Russian shareholders, and are at the same level as the 'B-'/Stable sovereign rating. Low external liquidity is a risk for Belarus but we assume that ad hoc financial support from Russia will continue. Deterioration of the sovereign credit profile would be negative for bank ratings as it would indicate a reduced ability to support banks and their public-sector borrowers. Capital erosion from a marked deterioration in asset quality or significant tightening of FX liquidity positions would also be credit negative for banks. The presentation "Belarus Banking Sector: Recovery Pending" is available at or by clicking the link above. Contact: Olga Ignatieva Senior Director, Financial Institutions +7 495 956 6906 Fitch Ratings CIS Limited 26 Valovaya Street Moscow 115054 David Prowse Senior Analyst, Fitch Wire +44 20 3530 1250 Media Relations: Julia Belskaya von Tell, Moscow, Tel: +7 495 956 9908, Email:; Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below