Reuters logo
Fitch Upgrades Russian Lipetsk Region to 'BB+'; Outlook Stable
March 10, 2017 / 5:10 PM / 9 months ago

Fitch Upgrades Russian Lipetsk Region to 'BB+'; Outlook Stable

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) Link to Fitch Ratings' Report: Lipetsk Region - Rating Action Report here MOSCOW, March 10 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has upgraded Russian Lipetsk Region's Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) to 'BB+' from 'BB' and affirmed the Short-Term Foreign Currency IDR at 'B'. The National Long-Term Rating has been upgraded to 'AA(rus)' from 'AA-(rus)' and withdrawn. The Outlook on the Long-Term Ratings is Stable. The region's senior debt ratings have been upgraded to long-term local currency 'BB+' from 'BB'. The region's senior debt National long-term rating has been upgraded to 'AA(rus)' from 'AA-(rus)' and withdrawn. The upgrade reflects the region's better-than-expected operating performance, which resulted in a low deficit before debt variation and corresponding decrease in debt. The National ratings are being withdrawn because Fitch has withdrawn its Russian National-scale ratings in response to a new regulatory framework for credit rating agencies in Russia (see Fitch Ratings Withdraws National Scale Ratings in the Russian Federation dated 23 December 2016). KEY RATING DRIVERS The 'BB+' ratings reflect the region's sound budgetary performance with an operating margin close to 15% and sound liquidity. They also take into account the high concentration of the regional economy in ferrous metallurgy, which makes Lipetsk region vulnerable to steel market fluctuations, leading to volatile tax revenue. The rating action reflects the following rating drivers and their relative weights: High: Sound Budgetary Performance Lipetsk Region continued to demonstrate sound operating results on a sustained basis, despite a drop in the operating margin in 2016. The latter decreased to 13.1% from a peak of 14.7% in 2015, after a stronger rouble negatively affected the revenue of the region's top taxpayer, export-oriented Novolipetsk Steel Plant (BBB-/Stable). Positively, financial sector profits accelerated significantly. Other contributors were excise duties, which rose 38% due to a tariff increase for petrochemicals, while personal income tax proceeds grew 5.5% amid growth of salaries across all sectors. Deficit before debt variation stood at a modest 0.9%. Fitch forecasts the region will stabilise its operating margin at 13%-15% over the medium-term. Its industrialised economy with a focus on the steel sector will gain from Russia's economic recovery. Fitch projects Russia's GDP will return to a growth of 1.3% in 2017, and that the region will run modest deficits of 1%-2% over the medium term, leading to broadly stable debt. The volatility of the region's finances is partly mitigated by the administration's prudent approach, which sets aside excess tax proceeds in cash reserves and keeps expenses under control. This led to a cash balance of RUB4.4 billion at end-2016, which constituted about 10% of the region's full-year operating revenue. Medium: Direct Risk Decrease Direct risk decreased further to 37.5% of current revenue in 2016 from 43.2% in 2015, while the debt payback ratio improved to a sound 3.6 years from 3.9 years. The administration used accumulated cash reserves to pay down the region's most expensive loans and finance the deficit, saving interest expenses. Fitch's baseline scenario forecasts the region's direct risk will stabilise at below 40% in the medium-term. As with most regions in Russia, Lipetsk Region is exposed to refinancing pressure in 2017-2019 when 91% of direct risk (RUB15.9 billion as of end-2016) matures. Despite a concentrated debt maturity profile, the region has manageable refinancing risks due to moderate debt levels, sound liquidity and access to federal loans. For 2017 refinancing needs are limited to RUB4.5 billion (26% of total outstanding debt), which is fully covered by cash reserves. The ratings also consider the following rating factors: Strong but Concentrated Economy Lipetsk Region has a fairly well-developed industrialised economy with a focus on the ferrous metallurgy sector, supporting wealth metrics above the national median. In 2016, gross regional product grew 2.2%, which is better than the wider Russian economy (a 0.4% fall). The ferrous metallurgy sector contributed 58% of the region's industrial output and around 37% of total tax proceeds in 2016, making the regional economy vulnerable to fluctuations in the domestic and international steel markets. Weak Institutional Framework Fitch views the region's credit profile as being constrained by the weak Russian institutional framework for sub-nationals, which has a shorter record of stable development than many of its international peers. The predictability of Russian local and regional governments' budgetary policy is hampered by the frequent reallocation of revenue and expenditure responsibilities within government tiers. RATING SENSITIVITIES An operating margin sustainably above 15%, accompanied by sound debt metrics with a direct risk-to-current balance (2016: 3.6 years) being in line with the weighted average debt maturity profile (2016: 2.5 years), would lead to an upgrade. Growth of direct risk, accompanied by deterioration in the operating margin leading to debt payback to above 10 years on a sustained basis, would lead to a downgrade. Contact: Primary Analyst Alexey Kobylyanskiy Analyst +7 495 956 99 80 Fitch Ratings CIS Ltd 26 Valovaya Street Moscow 115054 Secondary Analyst Vladimir Redkin Senior Director +7 495 956 24 05 Committee Chairperson Guido Bach Senior Director +49 69 768076 111 Media Relations: Julia Belskaya von Tell, Moscow, Tel: +7 495 956 9908, Email:; Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: Fitch has made a number of adjustments to the official accounts in order to make local and regional governments comparable internationally for analytical purposes: - Transfers of capital nature received were re-classified from operating revenue to capital revenue. - Transfers of capital nature made were re-classified from operating expenditure to capital expenditure. - Goods and services of capital nature were re-classified from operating expenditure to capital expenditure. Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria International Local and Regional Governments Rating Criteria - Outside the United States (pub. 18 Apr 2016) here National Scale Ratings Criteria (pub. 30 Oct 2013) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1020403 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below