Reuters logo
Fitch: US Trade Protectionism Remains Key Risk for World Economy
May 22, 2017 / 9:50 AM / 6 months ago

Fitch: US Trade Protectionism Remains Key Risk for World Economy

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) Link to Fitch Ratings' Report: Global Macro Scenario: US Trade Protectionism and Retaliatihere LONDON, May 22 (Fitch) The possibility of a sharp escalation in trade-protectionism remains a key risk for the world economy, despite recent signs of a more moderate approach to reforming trade relations from the US, says Fitch Ratings' Economics team in its latest global macro scenario report. The strongly protectionist rhetoric on trade seen during President Trump's election campaign and the new administration's early days in office has not, so far, translated into aggressive unilateral trade measures from the US. However, given the strength of anti-globalisation sentiment in the election and the continued focus of US policy makers on reducing bi-lateral trade deficits, the possibility of a more disruptive and unilateral US approach that is less compatible with the existing global trade governance framework - and much more likely to prompt retaliatory actions from US trade partners - remains a significant risk. Fitch has used a macro model-based simulation to illustrate the potential implications of a hypothetical 'trade war' scenario for the global economy. The scenario is built on a combined shock of three components: first, the US imposes a 35% tariff on imports from Mexico, China, South Korea and Taiwan and this prompts retaliation with equivalent tariffs on US imports from these countries; second, the US deports one million migrants, reducing the US labour force; and third, as the adverse shock hits the global economy, business and household confidence falls in all major economies. Canada was not part of the shock, reflecting its small bilateral trade surplus with the US and its absence from the US Treasury's 'monitoring list' of trading partners that merit close attention on currency practices. "A hypothetical trade war would lead to adverse outcomes in all major economies. The US and the countries directly targeted by the imposition of punitive US import tariffs would see the largest losses of GDP but global repercussions would be significant as business and household confidence falls, asset prices weaken and trade flows are affected more widely, including through disruptions to multinational supply chains," said Brian Coulton, Fitch's Chief Economist. "The peak impact on the US economy would materialise in 2019 when the annual growth rate would be 1.3%, 1% lower than the 2.3% GDP growth in our baseline global macroeconomic forecast. For 2017, GDP growth would be 1.9% in the shock scenario, compared with 2.1% in the baseline and in 2018 growth would be 2%, compared with 2.6% in the baseline," added Gergely Kiss, Director in Fitch's Economics team. In China, GDP would be hit even more significantly than in the US. At its peak impact, Chinese GDP would be 2.8pp below the baseline by 2019, almost entirely due to the trade channel. The highly open Korean economy would suffer a similar peak shock (2.9pp) by 2019. In Mexico the peak GDP loss relative to the baseline scenario would be 2.3pp by 2019. Mexico's trade linkages with the US are stronger than those of China, but the scenario sees some offsetting benefits from 15% peso depreciation and faster domestic labour force growth, as net migration to the US is reversed. "Other major advanced economies such as the eurozone, Japan and the UK would also feel the negative consequences of the shock. This would predominantly originate from the confidence channel in the eurozone and the UK, leading to negative wealth effects, similar to the US," said Kiss. For large emerging markets not directly affected by tariff changes the peak impact would still be significant. In India, GDP would be 1.3pp lower than the baseline, while in Brazil and Russia the deviation would be 0.8 and 0.9pp, respectively versus the baselines. The trade channel is the dominant source in all emerging countries and the confidence channel is significantly weaker, mainly due to the less developed financial markets. The report "Global Macro Scenario: US Trade Protectionism and Retaliation" is available at or by clicking the link. Notes for Editors: Fitch's Economics team, led by Chief Economist Brian Coulton, analyses global macroeconomic trends and their impact on credit markets around the world. The team publishes global macroeconomic research, forecasts and commentary focusing on 20 major advanced and emerging economies. The Global Economic Outlook, the flagship publication of Fitch's Economics team, and other global economic research and commentary are available at Contact: Gergely Kiss Director +44 20 3530 1425 Fitch Ratings Limited 30 North Colonnade London E14 5GN Brian Coulton Chief Economist +44 20 3530 1140 Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: Additional information is available on ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below