Reuters logo
Fitch Maintains Towergate's Negative Outlook
December 8, 2016 / 1:15 PM / a year ago

Fitch Maintains Towergate's Negative Outlook

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) LONDON, December 08 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings, London-8 December 2016: Fitch Ratings has affirmed TIG Finco PLC's (Towergate) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B-'. The Outlook remains Negative. Fitch has also affirmed Towergate's GBP75m super senior secured notes at 'BB-'/'RR1' and downgraded the GBP425m senior secured notes due 2020 to 'B-'/'RR4' from 'B'/'RR3'. Over the last year, Towergate has successfully reduced costs through its transformation plan, but continued declines in sales led to both falling earnings and leverage remaining high for the assigned 'B-' IDR. The Negative Outlook reflects the uncertainty related to the deleveraging path and tight liquidity position, partly due to regulatory fines, but supported by disposal proceeds and monetisation of certain legacy assets by shareholders. In particular, progress on the transformation plan has been slow to date relative to Fitch's expectations and we see its delivery as critical to the success of the business. KEY RATING DRIVERS Delivery of Transformation Plan Critical: As part of Towergate's turnaround and restructuring plan, the management team has put in place a three-year transformation programme centred on a leaner cost structure and a more decentralised management of client accounts, which represents an unwinding of the original small business units (SBU) plan in its core broking division. The operational improvements from this plan are essential in allowing Towergate to stabilise its business and resume growth. Due to the ongoing nature of this plan, execution risk remains high. Delays in this programme would negatively impact both the delivery on revenue growth and improvements in FCF. Leading Insurance Intermediary, Experienced Management: Towergate maintains its leading position as an independent insurance intermediary in the UK, albeit at lower margins. Since its debt restructuring completed in April 2015, the group has been able to both renew and extend capacity with leading insurance providers and develop new business lines, such as its Bishopsgate London wholesale business. Fitch believes the management team's experience and reputation have been essential in achieving these objectives. Leverage Remains Elevated: FFO adjusted leverage and the FFO Fixed Charge Coverage ratio remain weak and will not be aligned with a 'B-' IDR by end-2016; however, we expect these key credit metrics to return to levels more consistent with the rating, at around 7.5x and 1.5x, respectively, by end-2017. The primary drivers of continued improvements in these credit metrics will be a reduction in restructuring costs and the materialisation of cost savings that should result in improving EBITDA margins; however, profit progression is subject to execution risks and a longer-than-expected deleveraging path could result in a downgrade to 'CCC'. We expect EBITDA margins to improve to 17.6% by FYE16 from 16.5% in 2015. Historically, margins have been above 20% and remain below those of 'B-' rated peers. Free Cash Flow Under Pressure: Towergate's cash flow has been negatively impacted by material exceptional items, such as restructuring costs, legacy customer redress payments for UCIS misselling, rebates of upfront payments from insurance companies and loss corridor payments relating to certain legacy underwriting actions. As a result, Towergate remains FCF negative. While these payments are difficult to predict, Fitch expects their magnitude to decrease, which, along with improving profitability, may support the group's financial flexibility. Support from Shareholders Key: As part of the 2015 restructuring, HPS Investment Partners LLC (formerly Highbridge Principal Strategies LLC) became the lead investor and largest shareholder. Throughout 2015, HPS played an important role in providing additional liquidity to Towergate through the sale of The Broker Network and by securitising a portion of the PaymentShield book. In combination, these actions injected GBP54m into the business. Subsequently, Madison Dearborn Partners LLC (MDP) acquired the second-largest shareholding in Towergate and it could invest additional equity in 1Q17, as disclosed in MDP's September 2016 tender documents. Average Recovery Prospects for Senior Noteholders: In its recovery analysis, Fitch adopted a going-concern approach, as the resultant enterprise value is higher than the liquidation approach. We assume a post-hypothetical restructuring EBITDA of GBP47.6m, which represents a 17% discount to Fitch's GBP57.4m pro forma 2016 EBITDA, and use a distressed EV/EBITDA multiple of 5x, reflecting Towergate's competitive advantage as it would take time for competitors to mirror its distribution capabilities, its expertise in niche markets and the relationship with leading insurers. Fitch considers the project Lunar facility as subordinated to the senior secured creditors. Therefore, we assess senior secured creditors' expected recoveries at 33%, consistent with an 'RR4' Recovery Rating and a 'B-' bond rating. DERIVATION SUMMARY Towergate has significantly smaller scale than its publicly rated insurance broker peers and has a less diverse product line. While its expertise in niche, high-margin product lines and its leading position among UK insurance brokers underpin a sustainable business model, its higher financial risk and underperforming business lines constrain the rating. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch's key assumptions within our rating case for the issuer include: - Modest positive sales growth during 2017-2019 - Transformation plan leads to EBITDA margins improving to 22% by 2018 - GBP65m total ETV payments during 2017-2020 - Improving working capital management with outflows declining from GBP15m to GBP5m by 2018 RATING SENSITIVITIES Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action (revision of the Outlook to Stable) - Evidence of financial metrics coming back into line with 'B-' peers, such as FFO fixed charge cover above 1.5x and FFO adjusted gross leverage below 7.5x on a sustained basis - Further evidence of shareholder commitment through a capital raising or progress towards refinancing high-cost debt - EBITDA margins trending above 20% Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action - Declining liquidity trending below GBP20m - FFO adjusted gross leverage remaining above 7.5x and FFO fixed charge cover remaining below 1.5x on a sustained basis and sustained negative FCF - Lack of improvement in EBITDA margin, suggesting no efficiency gains realised from the restructuring LIQUIDITY Constrained Liquidity: At end-3Q16, Towergate had GBP25m in operating cash and it is expected to receive GBP26m in proceeds from the Project Lunar facility. Towergate's liquidity has been negatively impacted by exceptional items, such as restructuring costs, regulatory fines and payments to its insurance partners. These items are unpredictable and, in combination with negative FCF, may lead to a further decline in liquidity. Offsetting this risk are potential cash inflows from the release of trapped cash, improved working capital management and the raising of new equity. Contact: Supervisory Analyst Brendan Condon Director +44 20 3530 1599 Fitch Ratings Limited 30 North Colonnade London E14 5GN Principal Analysts Athanasios Smprinis Analyst +44 20 3530 1643 Graham Coutts Director +44 20 3530 1654 Committee Chairperson Pablo Mazzini Senior Director +44 20 3530 1021 Date of Relevant Rating Committee: 5 December 2016 Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: Summary of Financial Statement Adjustments Stub Period - Includes the pro forma 2015 results prior to the formation of TIG Finco plc on 2 April 2015. Restricted Cash - we exclude cash from segregated accounts and funds that are required to be held by the regulator (GBP149m as of FYE15) from our computation of readily available cash. Additional information is available on For regulatory purposes in various jurisdictions, the supervisory analyst named above is deemed to be the primary analyst for this issuer; the principal analyst is deemed to be the secondary. Applicable Criteria Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates (pub. 27 Sep 2016) here Recovery Ratings and Notching Criteria for Non-Financial Corporate Issuers (pub. 21 Nov 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1016106 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below