Jan 16 (Reuters) - Debate over Nike’s Vaporfly shoes that some say give runners an unfair technological advantage may actually help the world’s largest athletic apparel company sell more shoes, analysts said on Thursday.
A working group at governing body World Athletics has been examining for months what to do about the hyper-advanced footwear, used by elite runners Kenya’s Eliud Kipchoge and Brigid Kosgei in stunning performances last year.
Competing media reports this week have claimed, without giving sources, that it will either issue a wholesale ban on the shoes or take more limited measures to deal with the carbon plate and foam sole technology it uses to aid runners.
Debate has raged among athletes and commentators on Twitter and other social media sites about whether the shoes should be allowed and if a ban could be implemented effectively beyond heavily-monitored elite racing.
The publicity may only benefit Nike’s bottom line.
“Controversy is good for sales,” said Matt Powell, senior sports industry adviser at NPD Group.
“Nike has not made a lot of pairs here, so (there is) no real financial impact. Amateur runners can still run in these shoes.”
Kipchoge, who wore Vaporflys when he ran the first sub-two-hour marathon in Vienna last October, told the Telegraph on Wednesday that wearing the shoes was “fair” and that the sport should embrace such technological advances.
Nike says on its website that the shoe, which retails at around $250, has “a built-in secret weapon”. It did not respond to requests for comment on Thursday.
Shares in the Oregon-based firm were up 0.5%, while those in rivals Under Armour and Skechers USA gained about 1.5%. Japan’s Asics Corp earlier closed up 2.5%.
Independent studies have concluded that the shoes, which have a curved, carbon-fiber plate embedded in a thick layer of lightweight foam, improve metabolic efficiency by 4%, though that does not necessarily mean a runner will be 4% faster.
Nike, which aims to sell $50 billion worth of sportswear this year, capitalized in the 1980s on the controversy around Michael Jordan wearing red and black sneakers which violated the NBA’s “predominantly white” rules.
Nike put black censor bars over the sneakers in TV ads and later re-launched its Air Jordan 1 shoes in a “banned” edition. The brand went on to become a billion dollar business.
“On the surface, banning a shoe for providing exceptional performance wouldn’t mar Nike’s reputation,” said Carol Spieckerman, president of retail consultancy Spieckerman Retail.
“The controversy could easily increase general sales for the Vaporfly.” (Reporting by Nivedita Balu, Aishwarya Venugopal and Shrivathsa Sridhar in Bengaluru and Melissa Fares in New York; Editing by Arun Koyyur)
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.