Reuters logo
UPDATE 1-U.S. high court won't halt price-fixing class action against containerboard makers
April 17, 2017 / 1:57 PM / 7 months ago

UPDATE 1-U.S. high court won't halt price-fixing class action against containerboard makers

(Adds background on case, paragraphs 4-10)

By Andrew Chung

WASHINGTON, April 17 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to halt a class action lawsuit against several containerboard manufacturers, which could now face trial on claims of price fixing by tens of thousands of buyers and nearly $12 billion in potential damages.

The justices left in place a federal judge’s certification of the antitrust class action against manufacturers including International Paper Co, Weyerhaeuser Co and Georgia-Pacific LLC. The companies argued that individually negotiated pricing regimes with the buyers should preclude class action certification.

The defendants make containerboard, a heavy stock paper used to produce a variety of cardboard products, from shipping containers to takeout pizza boxes. Several containerboard or cardboard product buyers, including Minnesota-based floor care product maker Kleen Products LLC, filed suit in Chicago federal court in 2010 alleging the manufacturers violated U.S. antitrust law.

The buyers said that between 2004 and 2010 the manufacturers conspired to manipulate prices by closing or idling mills to restrict production of the material, attempting 15 coordinated price increases during that time.

They sought class certification, and the trial court allowed it, a decision upheld by the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last August. That court said the buyers had shown there was proof common to the class members showing they were injured by the anti-competitive behavior.

“Purchasers tendered extensive evidence that, if believed, would be enough to prove the existence of the alleged conspiracy,” the appeals court said, adding that the evidence is largely circumstantial.

The manufacturers appealed to the Supreme Court, saying the lower courts should not have allowed a class action when the trial would be loaded with questions about whether each buyer paid artificially high prices and by how much.

The manufacturers said in court papers that in their industry, terms of sale are negotiated between buyers and sellers, resulting in widely varying prices and contracts, which other courts have held undercuts the presumption of class-wide harm.

“The presence of this individualized pricing should have precluded class certification of the sprawling and disparate class certified here,” the manufacturers said.

Weyerhaeuser sold its containerboard business to International Paper for $6 billion in 2008.

Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below