SEOUL, March 23 (Reuters) - Voices of concern emerged in South Korea and elsewhere in Asia on Friday after U.S. President Donald Trump shook up his foreign policy team again, prompting worries over Trump’s pending summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
Trump announced in a tweet he was replacing H.R. McMaster with John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations known for his hard-line stance advocating the use of military force against North Korea and Iran.
Administrative officials in Seoul said they would continue communicating closely with Washington over the ongoing detente with North Korea, but their comments were tinged with worry.
“Our stance is that if a new road opens, we have to go that path,” a senior Blue House official told reporters. “Bolton has much knowledge on the issues regarding the Korean peninsula and most of all, we know him to be one of the U.S. president’s aides who is trusted.”
He said Chung Eui-yong, South Korea’s National Security Office head, had not yet spoken with Bolton and that Chung’s reaction to McMaster’s dismissal was “not bad”.
Another administrative official in Seoul expressed regret over the loss of camaraderie McMaster had built with his South Korean counterpart as they had tackled North Korea’s nuclear issue together.
Both officials requested not to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue.
The announcement came 10 days after Trump fired Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, another moderating influence, replacing him with CIA director Mike Pompeo.
The administration of South Korean President Moon Jae-in is keen to see successful talks between the United States and North Korea, expected sometime in May.
The two Koreas are also scheduled to hold their first summit in more than a decade in late April, building on friendly exchanges that began after Kim Jong Un said in a New Year’s address he wanted to improve ties with South Korea.
That goodwill could disappear with Bolton’s appearance, others said.
“If Bolton take office and talks with North Korea go haywire and yield bad results, I don’t know what we’ll do then,” said Kim Hack-yong, conservative lawmaker and head of the national defence committee of South Korea’s parliament.
“It might be great if Kim Jong Un comes to talks with a free spirit but any turns in a negative direction could mean all our work over the years to engage North Korea could turn to dust.”
Bolton, in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal last month, concluded it was “perfectly legitimate for the United States to respond to the current ‘necessity’ posed by North Korea’s nuclear weapons by striking first”.
Bolton’s appointment will further diminish hope for China and the United States to see eye-to-eye on security issues, according to Shi Yinhong, an expert on China-U.S. relations at Renmin University in Beijing.
“What security cooperation with China can there be? Nuclear weapons, North Korea, Taiwan, South China Sea, cyberspace… Where is there hope for cooperation?” Shi said.
“Trump and Xi Jinping have spoken in public of the logic of cooperation, but with the negative direction of trade and security cooperation, these words seem more and more empty.”
Tokyo expressed hopes communication with Washington would go on as normal, with one Japanese government official saying he was “very optimistic” Japan would be able to get along with Bolton as he has many friends inside the Japanese government.
Narushige Michishita, a professor at Tokyo’s Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, said Bolton’s insistence on pressure and sanctions was “good news” but his toughness could present a hurdle in dealing with Pyongyang.
“The bad news is, sometimes he is too tough,” Michishita said. “He is consistently tough. The problem is that he doesn’t have any flexibility. That’s a negative concern that I have.” (Reporting by Christine Kim Additional reporting by Heekyong Yang in SEOUL, Christian Shepherd in BEIJING and Linda Sieg in TOKYO Editing by Lincoln Feast)