• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Romney tax plan is "Robin Hood in reverse": Obama

U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks at an election campaign fundraiser in Stamford, Connecticut, August 6, 2012. REUTERS/Jason Reed

U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks at an election campaign fundraiser in Stamford, Connecticut, August 6, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

STAMFORD, Connecticut | Tue Aug 7, 2012 7:49am IST

STAMFORD, Connecticut (Reuters) - Adding a new attack line to his campaign arsenal, President Barack Obama derided Republican rival Mitt Romney's tax plan on Monday as Robin Hood in reverse - "Romney Hood " - saying it essentially would rob ordinary Americans to help the rich.

Obama stepped up his criticism of Romney's tax proposals at a re-election fundraiser in Connecticut on the same day Romney's campaign reported that it had outraised the Democratic president by more than $25 million in July.

Reaching back to the Middle Ages, Obama invoked the legendary outlaw of old in an attempt to sharpen the contrast with Romney, whom the president said would cut taxes for the richest 2 percent of Americans and pay for it by raising taxes on the middle class.

"It's like Robin Hood in reverse. It's Romney Hood," he said, drawing loud applause and laughs from a crowd of about 500 who paid $500 a head to attend the event in a hotel ballroom.

It was the latest twist in the Obama campaign's effort to paint Obama as a champion of the middle class while casting Romney, one of the richest men to ever run for the White House, as intent on protecting the fortunes of wealthier Americans.

Obama sought to back his accusation by citing a report last week by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center that found that Romney's proposal to slash income taxes by 20 percent across the board would boost income for the wealthiest taxpayers while reducing it for lesser earners.

The study calculated that Romney's tax cuts would boost after-tax income by an average of 4.1 percent for those earning more than $1 million a year, while reducing by an average of 1.2 percent the after-tax income of individuals earning less than $200,000.

The Romney campaign called the study biased.

Romney campaign spokesman Ryan Williams, responding to Obama's latest accusations, said the president was the only one in the race who would raise Americans' taxes.

"While he's used taxpayer dollars to grow government and reward his donors, middle-class Americans have seen fewer jobs, lower incomes, and less hope for the future," he said.

When Obama later headlined a glitzier fundraiser with a few dozen well-heeled donors at the Westport waterfront home of movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, there was no mention of the Robin Hood analogy in remarks that journalists were allowed to hear.

The $35,800-a-person event was co-hosted by screenwriter Aaron Sorkin and actress Anne Hathaway. Vogue editor Anna Wintour, actress Joanne Woodward and talk-show host Jerry Springer were also in the crowd.

(Writing by Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Stacey Joyce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
1hotbird wrote:
Go Mitt!!! It’s not a doubt that you will outraise Obama every step of the way to the end of the election, and this is one more reason why Mitt should be in the white house!!!

Aug 06, 2012 9:26am IST  --  Report as abuse
1hotbird wrote:
THIS IS PROOF THAT MITT ROMNEY IS A LEADER!! TAKE NOTE OBAMA, THAT IS ONE OF THE QUALITYS OF LEADERSHIP!!

Aug 06, 2012 9:35am IST  --  Report as abuse
awootton wrote:
Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m fairly sure that the top 5% pay most of the taxes and the bottom 40% pay none. Seems to me that we already have a ‘robin hood’ tax scheme. Adjusting the current scheme by a couple of percent will still leave the US with a progressive tax code – where the rich pay more and the poor get paid.

Aug 06, 2012 9:37am IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.